Wednesday, May 28, 2014

Incorporating Sources Effectively


Audre Lorde:

Lorde, Audre. [“School”] Chapter 3 “Zami: A New Spelling of My Name – A Biomythography. Quality Paperback Book Club New York, 1982. Web.  28 May 2014


Freedom Writers:

Freedom Writers. By Erin Gurwell. Dir. Richard LaGravenese. Perf. Patrick Dempsey and Hilary  Swank. Paramount Pictures, 2007. DVD.


TED Talk:

“How Schools Kill Creativity”. Perf. Sir Ken Robinson. Sir Ken Robinson. TED, n.d. Web. 26 May 2014.       


Joshua Romero:      

Romero, Joshua J. "How I Learned to Live Google-free." - IEEE Spectrum. N.p., 6 June 2011. Web. 28 May 2014

Mike Rose:

Rose, Mike. “I Just Wanna Be Average.  Lives on the Boundary: A Moving Account of the Struggles and Achievements of America’s Educationally Underprepared. New York: MacMillan, 1989. Web. 24 Dec. 2010

Tuesday, May 27, 2014

Outline For Paper #3

The WHAT?
     Finding yourself in a volunteering setting (learning who and what you want/are) where a typical school setting can't always focus on the individual.

The WHO?
     Students

The WHY and WHAT?
      Not to overlook things in life and go in with a negative attitude. Follow what you want to do. (finding yourself)

      They will learn that there is a lot more to learn then just in a classroom. Learning something that they otherwise may have never figured out.

REASONS TO AGREE:

#1 Provides self-moving

#2 Provides you with a drive( something that makes you want to succeed/fight for)

#3 Gives you something to look forward to and pursue (hope)

REASONS THEY WON'T AGREE:

#1 They think that they know enough about themselves and that they don't need to know more.

#2 Happy with way things are and don't want change.

#3 Strongly believe that volunteering can't have a bigger impact than a traditional school setting does.

OBJECTIONS:

#1 There is something new you can find out about yourself.

#2 Change isn't always good but can help push you in the right direction.

#3 Volunteering can change a person.

SUPPORT:

#1 Thinking you know what you want to do, but realize that you want to do something else. Allows you to help shape yourself for a new want.

#2 Changing your plans may not always be what you want. Like going to community college rather than a 4-year or changing your degree from Nursing to Education. Saves you in the long run. Teaches you things about yourself.

#3 Volunteering has changed me. I was doubter. I thought I wouldn't learn anything. I was doing it to to fulfill a requirement rather than wanting to do it for myself. After the experience I have discovered a new passion, a fight for education that I once didn't appreciate. I know do it because I love doing it. It gives you a new meaning and a way to look at things.

Tuesday, May 20, 2014

WS pp 19-22 and how it pertained to our writing assignment:

After reading over the pages and keeping in mind our paper it helped me understand the structure of how our essay should be formed. It broke it down and gave a good outline of the way the paper should be structured. It also gave you ideas on how to get your ideas across. For example using "Main Points" to get your idea out there and then using "Subpoints" as a way to provide details and support to the big picture. Another thing it provided was when stating something back it up with a reason. When writing a compare and contrast essay you need to back up the information you are saying. If you make a statement you should either have a fact or an example to prove that point. That is a key component of writing this type of essay. You must be able to back up what you are saying to prove to the reader that you have a understanding of what you are talking about. Lastly it is important that your paper hooks to the reader and transitions smoothly. With that being said you don't want random facts or an abrupt ending to a paragraph. After reading this section it helped me understand how my paper should be structured and how to include my examples and make my essay flow better.

Using Details in Examples Worksheet

1. When I was five years old and still legally blind, I started school in a sight conservation class in the local public school on 135th street and Lenox Avenue. On the corner was a blue wooden booth where white women gave away free milk to black mothers with children. I used to long for some Hearst Free Milk Fund milk, in one of those cute little bottles with their red and white tops, but my mother never allowed me to have any, because she said it was for charity, which was bad and demeaning, and besides the milk was warm and might make me sick

  When I was a little girl and scared of the dark, I started to sleep with all the lights on in my room and would leave my door wide open to let any light from the hallway in.


2. Suddenly, I looked up, and there was a library lady standing over me. My mother's hands had dropped to her sides. From the floor where I was lying, Mrs. Baker seemed like yet another mile-high woman about to do me in. She had immense, light, hooded eyes and a very quiet voice that said, not damnation for my noise, but "Would you like to hear a story, little girl?"

    Suddenly, they were everywhere, and there I was being looked down upon. 

Monday, May 19, 2014

Third Person Intro:








The main point of my narrative was to let people know that you can find yourself in the strangest places. For me, it was volunteering for an old teacher to fulfill a graduation requirement. I think it says a lot about life. Even though that sounds cliché, it is the truth. We can find things out about ourselves in the oddest of places. But, it is what we do with those experiences that makes them worthwhile. I hope people can see that you can only make yourself happy, so you mind as well follow your dreams and pursue what you want to do.

The main point of the narrative was to let people know that they can find themselves in the strangest of places. For her, it was volunteering for an old teacher to fulfill a graduation requirement. That one experience can change the way things  have such a huge impact. It says a lot about life and how certain life events can make a big change.  That things just happen to fall into place and having no idea that they can make an impact or not. Even though that sounds cliché, it is the truth. Finding things out in the oddest of places is what makes it unique. It is a true act of education. It may not be the typical formal education, but it is something that they are able to learn from themselves rather than someone teaching them. But it's what they do with those experiences that makes them worthwhile. Figuring out that they can only make themselves happy is the lesson that they can take away from the experience.

Grand Scheme:
Volunteering can help shape people in who they want to be and teach them important life lessons. Figuring out the lesson that is being taught and applying it to their life is even more important and finding it in a strange place is what makes it unique. This in itself teaches people more than a traditional educational setting would.

Friday, May 16, 2014

Paper 2 : What Makes a Good Teacher?

Teachers come in and out of our lives -- they either make an impact or they have no effect on us at all. The difference between the two is good teaching and bad teaching. Two teachers that have proven to make an impact are Mr. Keating and Ms. Gruwell. Both of them have shown dedication to their career, real love for their students, and mind opening experiences.
Dedication isn’t something where you do the bare-minimum to get by -- you have to prove that whatever you are doing is worth the price to pay. That price may be losing a marriage or losing your job, both of these are the cases for Ms. Gruwell and Mr. Keating. When most of us think about good teaching we think about teachers that have had some sort of impact on us. They may have helped us finally figure out that tricky math problem we had been stuck on for weeks or they may have been there to help us through a tough time. But no matter what the occasion was they left their mark. The teaching styles of Ms. Gruwell and Mr. Keating are very similar, they both use an active style of teaching where they get their students involved in the learning. In the case of Ms. Gruwell and Mr. Keating they left a huge impression on their students. They were the ones that risked everything just so their students had the opportunity to have something better. In the case of Ms. Gruwell she took on three jobs. Those jobs weren’t just because teachers are paid enough, which is a whole other topic. The purpose of those jobs was to provide for her students, from the money she made she bought her students books and journals. This provided her students with confidence. Confidence that they could be whatever they wanted to be and that they were worth it. As any one of us could imagine juggling three jobs and a marriage something was bound to go wrong. For Ms. Gruwell’s case she lost her marriage. Dedication isn’t something that is easy – you give a little and take a little. Finding the balance is the art. Mr. Keating had an understanding of balancing dedication. He knew that if he dove right in he’d never resurface, but if he didn’t dive at all he wouldn’t make a splash. Mr. Keating had a point he wanted to make to his students – that point was that live your own life. Now that seems like a pretty basic point and how does that relate to dedication? It relates to dedication because Mr. Keating gave his students something that no other teacher at the school could – he gave them a voice, “Boys, you must strive to find your own voice. Because the longer you wait to begin, the less likely you are to find it at all” (Dead Poets Society). By providing his students with a voice he gave them a whole new view on life and the outside world. He has them do this in all sorts of ways, from standing on tables to get a new perspective. The whole point of that was when you are getting use to the same thing try to look at it from another direction. His purpose was to have them see themselves for who they were and not who their parents wanted them to be. Dedication comes with risks – for Mr. Keating the risk was his job. The outcome on the students was far greater than either of them could imagine.
Teaching requires a certain type of drive – a drive for your students and not yourself. The outcome isn’t to make yourself look good, but to make your students thrive. In other words it’s having a love for your students and that is something that good teachers have and bad teachers don’t. When the drive is lost you also lose your students and in turn leave them out to dry. Ms. Gruwell is a teacher that has that drive where her students come first. Her love was tested right at the beginning, when she was given a class filled with ‘failures’. Right then it could have broken her. Turned a good teacher into a bad teacher within a snap of your fingers. Instead of doing what most other teachers would have done in her shoes, she decided she was going to connect with them. This was one of her biggest challenges, proving that she had respect for them, “Why should I give you my respect to you? Because you're a teacher? I don't know you. How do I know you're not a liar standing up there. How do I know you're not a bad person standing up there? I'm not just gonna give you my respect because you're called a teacher”(Freedom Writers). She knew her only was to break through was to connect with these inner-city kids. After trying and trying and trying she finally broke through. The one thing she had to gain was trust, one thing that no other teacher had ever been able to prove. By showing them that trust they allowed her to come into their world. Mr. Keating on the other hand didn’t have to earn trust. His students were over obedient and he wanted them to think for themselves. Mr. Keating and Ms. Gruwell had the opposite problem, but also the same problem. Meaning they both wanted their students to see themselves for who they are, not what their parents wanted them to be or what their race defined them as. They wanted them to dig deep down and figure out what it meant to be themselves. Mr. Keating taught them this by using alternative methods of teaching; such as when learning about poetry he wanted them to feel it. So he had them recite their poems to the music. He also had them do a simple act of follow the leader, showing them how they just hopped right in and did what the other person was doing. Mr. Keating’s love for his students was shown through the way he wanted them to embrace their dreams.
When we think of good teachers we think of teachers that have showed us something we would have never thought of. They have showed us a new perspective on things or opened our eyes to the world around us. Those teachers are the ones that make the most impact. They take what we know and they make it more relatable and real. Ms. Gruwell does this by taking what her students know and applying knowledge that is relatable. She introduces them to the Holocaust. Now these kids had never heard of this, but yet they were living it. Just like the Holocaust they were judge by the race they were. They lived a battle every day and to die with honor meant you fought for your kind. Not only did Gruwell play off of what they already knew, but also she showed them a tragic ending to what it would end up being. She had them interested in something that they could relate to and not just one or two of them – but the entire class could. She showed them that they aren’t alone. That to end a battle you must fight together. She also took them on a field trip that showed them that the rest of the world isn’t a battleground. She took them out of the ‘hood’ and into the city where they went to a museum and learned about the children that have been affected by hate. This museum was exactly what her students needed. It showed them the affect of hatred and how it ends, typically ending in tragedy. By showing her students this she showed them that not everywhere is a battle. She gave them something to aspire to be. Mr. Keating did something very similar to that. He showed his students that to be who you are meant to be you must stand up for yourself. You must aspire to do great things and to be happy with what the outcome may be. He did this by introducing to the boys to ‘The Dead Poets Society’. This secret society was to show the boys to take a step away from what everyone else was doing. It was a way for them to rebel against conformity. By showing giving them “The Dead Poets Society” it provide them with an understanding of how to live life. To live for themselves rather than for others and to live in the now rather than following what everyone else was doing.
No matter what kind of teachers we have had in the past, these two teachers have made an impact that most teachers cannot. We take for granted of what we are given and just take what is handed to us. To make a teacher great, they make you work for what they are giving. Mr. Keating and Ms. Gruwell are very different, but they both are able to bring out the best in their students and show them the best in themselves.



Wednesday, May 14, 2014

Comma Splices, Fragments, and Fused Sentences Work Sheet

1. The police officer bit the dog and the cat ran away.
2. The cat ran up the tree; the dog ran home.
3. Pat drove to the store and I went anyway.
4. We were having fun, and they wanted to too.
5. I learned to drive a car.
6. Although Jim had bought a car, he walked to work.
7. We started to play in the swimming, and it was fun.
8. Whether we came home or went to the store, we still had to drive.
9. If I had ten dollars, I could buy an ice cream.
10. Upon arriving at the bank, I left my money at home.

Tuesday, May 13, 2014

Sentence Correction:

Sentence: "My educational experience isn't just a two way street, it's more like a highway."
Corrected Version: "My educational experience isn't just a two way street; it's more like a highway."

I believe the sentence was a comma splice but in the corrected version I used semicolon to connect the two.

Saturday, May 10, 2014

How Gruwell and Keating Are Similar and Different:

Ms. Gruwell and Mr.Keating are both teachers that love to teach. They want their students to go above and beyond and to see how important they really are. Gruwell does this by showing her students that she believes they can succeed when no one else does. She shows them care and love when a teacher has never done that for them. She also has to prove to them that they can trust her and with trusting her they gained a lot more then they would have ever thought. Keating does the same thing. He shows his students that their lives are their own. That you can't please everyone and if you are going to please some one make sure its yourself. Both of the teachers help break the shells of their students. They both show them their full potential and show them that there is so much more to life that still needs to be discovered. Keating does this by using the Dead Poets Society to break through to the boys. It shows them that their is more to life then checking all the boxes. That following your dreams is something that you have to do. Gruwell does it by showing her students the importance of education. She takes them on field trips and shows them life outside "the hood", shows them that life doesn't have to be an uphill battle. Gruwell and Keating also have their differences. One difference would be in the type of schools they both teach in. Gruwell teaches in a inner city public school where Keating teaches in a private religious school that is very conservative. This in turn makes their methods of approaching the problem very different. Gruwell goes straight to the administration where Keating works with his students where the administration can't really pick up on. I feel that Gruwell took the bigger risk in a sense. She was risking putting her job on the line to save her students. But, so did Keating. Both of their situation are very different because of the settings they are in. How one is much more open then the other and the other is very conservative and there is no room for change. At the end though both teachers took the necessary risks and got their jobs done. They both were inspiring teachers that taught their students to seek their goals and never aim lower.

Wednesday, May 7, 2014

Continued notes on "Dead Poets Society"

  • Takes students to the court yard and shows them that they can't always follow the directions of others. That going in another direction from everyone else is normal and their is more to life then following what others do.
  • Charlie publishes an article in the school paper saying that the Dead Poets Society wants girls to be admitted to the school. He admits to writing the article and get paddled. Charlie is later asked to turn in the members of the society and that he will be forgiven.
  • Keating gets talked to by the dean since he believes his methods of teaching are unothrodoxed. Keating is just trying to show the students that conformity is not everything.
  • Neil's father finds out that he has joined a play and tells him he has to quit.
  • Neil goes and confines in Keating after his father comes to visit. He talks to Keating about his passion for acting and how his father doesn't know who he is and what he wants. Keating tells him to live his life the way he wants to, tell his father what he is feeling.
  • The boys and Mr. Keating went to Neil's play where Neil's father shows up to. His father takes him home and is withdrawing him from the school and sending him to a military school where he will be going to Harvard and becoming a doctor.
  • Neil commits suicide.
  • Todd and the other boys are devastated after the loss of their friend.
  • Mr. Keating is being blamed for the death of Neil since he "put them up for it". Meaning he showed them a different view of life and how to be what they wanted to be.
  • All the boys that were in the Dead Poets Society get brought into the dean's office. Where they are to sign a letter resulting in Mr. Keating being fired.
  • When Keating goes to collect his things from the classroom the students protest by standing on the desks and saying, "O captain, my captain."

Tuesday, May 6, 2014

Comparing and Contrasting "Freedom Writers" and "Dead Poets Society"

Both schools that were portrayed in the movie are completely different. In the movie, "Freedom Writers" it portrays a inner city school in modern time. Where, "Dead Poets Society" is a all boys religious school and is set in the 60's. Also, they both had totally different images that they were meant to uphold. In the "Dead Poets Society" the school was meant to produce high functioning citizens. The goal of the school was to produce leaders such as, lawyers, doctors, and politicians. Where as in "Freedom Writers" they were lucky if half their students lived to graduate or made it without dropping out. They don't expect much and in return they don't receive much.

Gruwell and Keating are both passionate teachers that want their students to get the most out of education that they can. They both want their students to see their full potential, when the students themselves don't. One thing that makes them different is Gruwell had to make herself fit in with her students. She had to earn respect from them to get through to them. Where Keating had the respect, but he wanted his students to see that there is more to sitting and listening.

I've had a teacher more like Keating. A teacher that knew I had potential and found a way to unlock it. Not only did I have to work for it, but I also learned from it. I think Keating is more relatable because he's a teacher that can see through students. He knows their fears and can help them find their own voice. Where Gruwell had to prove herself to her students, her school, and herself.

Monday, May 5, 2014

"Dead Poets Society" Notes

  • Religious and an all boys school
  • It's a boarding school (students live at the school)
  • Boys who are attending the school aren't following their dreams, but following their parents ideas of what they should be.
  • Robin Williams is a different from the other teachers at the school. He wants them to understand that there is more to writing. He has them rip pages out of their textbooks that produce an equation on how to produce poetry.
  • He wants them to be free thinkers where his colleagues think they can't. They  believe that they don't know what they need and therefore need to be told and follow what they are told to do.
  • He tells them to look at the world in a different way. He wants them to think about what they think and find their own voice.



Robin Williams is a great teacher. He wants his students to find themselves and to not let others tell them what they should be. HE provides them with a voice for them to be heard.